THORNE vs Optimum Nutrition: Amazon sales compared

Estimated Amazon revenue, units and category ranks for both brands, side by side. Updated October 15, 2026.

On Amazon, THORNE brings in an estimated $22.7M/mo versus $6.9M/mo for Optimum Nutrition, about 3.3× as much as its rival (modeled estimates, Oct 15, 2026). THORNE also sells more units (~665K vs ~21K a month) across 52 ranked products to 14. They meet in 9 Best Sellers lists: THORNE leads in 5 and Optimum Nutrition in 4. Average ratings are close at 4.60 vs 4.56.

Head to head

MetricTHORNEOptimum Nutrition
Est. revenue/mo$22.7M$6.9M
Est. units/mo665K21K
Overall rank (score)#3#13
Rank by est. revenue#1#12
SuppRanked score90.573.9
Best-selling products5214
Categories ranked in339
#1 category ranks02
Avg rating4.604.56
Total reviews168K226K
Gummy share0%0%

Shared categories Est. revenue/mo in each Best Sellers top 100 · best position

CategoryTHORNEOptimum NutritionBest rank
Vitamins, Minerals & Supplements$9M$3.6M#5 / #6
Diet & Sports Nutrition$5.6M$5.6M#8 / #5
Sports Nutrition$5M$5.6M#6 / #4
Amino Acids$6.3M$4.3M#2 / #3
Creatine$4.8M$2.2M#2 / #3
Whey Protein$269K$2.2M#24 / #1
Protein$269K$1.7M#81 / #1
Zinc$698K$143K#3 / #27
Plant Protein$89K$84K#21 / #13

Top products

Estimates, not official Amazon data. Rankings and revenue are modeled from public Amazon Best Sellers lists and list prices (units × price, before returns, discounts and fees; not profit) and may differ from real sales. How it works.

FAQ

Which sells more on Amazon, THORNE or Optimum Nutrition?

By SuppRanked's estimates, THORNE sells more: about $22.7M/mo in Amazon revenue versus $6.9M/mo for Optimum Nutrition. These are SuppRanked's modeled estimates from public Amazon Best Sellers ranks and list prices (October 15, 2026), not official Amazon sales data.

Who sells more Vitamins, Minerals & Supplements on Amazon, THORNE or Optimum Nutrition?

In the Vitamins, Minerals & Supplements Best Sellers top 100, THORNE leads with ~$9M/mo estimated, against ~$3.6M/mo for Optimum Nutrition. Estimates only.

More comparisons